Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Cassel vs. Haynesworth




Cassel or Haynesworth? Czarnecki agrees with me:

http://msn.foxsports.com/nfl/story/9282830/Reviewing-the-first-weekend-of-NFL-free-agency

Cassel is a bigger deal for a few reasons:

1.The Cassel deal will have implications in the NFL for years to come.

Cutler wants out of Denver because of this deal. The Pats are gonna be up the creek without a paddle when Brady goes down again. The Chiefs have a good QB now.



2. The Redskins dump money on big name free agents every year.

And they win the Superbowl every year. No, they don't. They spend money willy nilly. Haynesworth is just another in a long line of free agents they spent a ton of money on.









3. Albert Haynesworth stomps on people. Literally.

Remember? He's that guy. He's a punk. Trouble maker. Hot head. He'll do something dumb again and get suspended again.

2 comments:

  1. History shows that the top free agent taken is never a disappointment to the team he goes to. So I stick by Haynesworth. Also, yeah, he stomped on that guy's face a few years ago, I remember. But he's not a punk. A punk doesn't get it and keeps doing stupid crap like that. Pacman's a punk. Haynesworth is not a repeat offender and not a punk.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Also, I don't know who Czarnecki is and I don't know what he said and I'm not clicking your link, so there...

    ReplyDelete